Bits of Books - Books by Title


The Evolution of Everything

How New Ideas Emerge

Matt Ridley







More books on Evolution

Great Man theory - History gets written as if it's Intelligent Design - generals win battles, politicians control countries, scientists discover truths, inventors invent new things. But the world much less a planned place than this implies. The battle more often won by happenstance - weather, a lost map, a misunderstood order.

Traditional idea of inventions by geniuses who stumble upon ideas that change the world. But if Edison hadn't invented the light bulb, there were at least 23 others who were working on the thing at the same time.

More books on Inventions

We think of the world as 'top-down' - we are moral bc God tells us to be, we are lawful bc the state tells us to be.

Newton the first to break free of this - gravity keeps planets in orbits, and apples falling, not the supervision of God.

When 60,000 people died in Lisbon earthquake of 1755, on All Saints day when the churches were full, theologians dutifully trotted out the verdict that God was punishing them for sinning. But for the first time this was met with scorn - "What, Lisbon more sinful than Paris, FFS?"

The 'anthropic principle' argument - that the Universe is perfectly adapted to human life, and if it had been just a tiny bit different, we would never have happened. But it gets cause and effect backward - we have adapted to the conditions, the environment hasn't been adapted to suit us.

More books on Religion

The Enlightenment embraced the idea that you could explain nature without recourse to a designer. Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, Spinoza.

Language is the ultimate example of a spontaneously organised artifact. Each language has its own structure and rules, but they are written from below, by users, not from above, by some authority. It evolves by itself, by trial and error. Words change meaning, go extinct, or emerge from existing words.

More books on Words

A child does not have an innate sense of mortality. It has to find out for itself that it is not the center of the Universe. By gradual trial and error he finds what behaviour leads to being treated well by others. It is by everyone accommodating their desires to those of others that a system of shared morality evolves.

No one person knows how to make a pencil; nobdy knows how to feed a city. The knowledeg is dispersed among multitudes of people, each acting in their own interests.

Suggestion that as Western society urbanised, it became politer and less violent, and Capitalist society disliked violent disruption. Your neighbour became a potential trading partner rather than a potential stealer of your sheep. Govt found it easier to tax peaceful citizens. Revenge became the national province of the govt rather than the private wrong to be righted.

The island of Gaua, part of Vanuatu, has a population of 2000, but 5 different native languages. Forested mountainous terrain.

Some parts of society have abandoned marriage and adopted practice of single motherhood, serviced by wandering, polygamous men. Whatever your explanation for it, it is clear that marriage is evolving before our eyes. It's never been 'designed', it just evolves to suit the society it is in.

More books on Marriage

The more urbanised a country is, the richer it is.

For the unthinking opponents of capitalism - gains from trade are mutual; if they weren't, people would not voluntarily participate. The more open and free the market, the less opportunity for exploitation or predation. Never perfect, but the bottom line is that countries run by merchants are always better than countries run by despots.

The thinkers who lived through the Industrial Revolution - Adam Smith, Malthus, John Stuart Mill - all missed the significance and the potential of what was unfolding before their eyes. They saw only the struggle and suffering, because their world view dominated by the idea of diminishing returns. Similar viewpoints common during the Great Depression of 1930's, and the stagflation of the 1970's.

Yet the opposite has always occurred. Far from diminishing, returns have always increased, thanks to mechanisation and cheap energy. As the world grew more populous, with more mouths to feed, fewer people starved.

The cost of food and clothing has steadily decreased over past 50 years, while the cost of health care and education has increased dramatically. The market provides food and clothing; the state education and health care.

Technology proceeds, like bio evo, to th 'adjacent possible'.

Trial-and-error is the most powerful process for solving problems in a complex world, while expert leadership is not. A story of fisherman's boats: "Every boat is copied from another boat ... It is clear that a very badly made boat will end up at the bottom after one or two voyages and so will never be copied ... One could then say that it is the sea itself which fashions the boats, choosing those which function and destroying the others."

New tech comes from tinkering, not from science.

Our personalities are decided in our teens. Not just our socialisation - where we copy the habits and accents of our peers - but more fundamentally, where we learn our status. In case of males, that is largely based on height and strength and how domineering you are. And women base theirs on how attractive others find them.

More books on Behaviour Where many go hungry, fortune will largely determine who gets fat. Once everybody has enough food, the ones who get fat will be the ones with a genetic propensity to get fat. So fatness wil be seen as hereditable. And same applies to intelligence. Once everyone gets a similarly good education, high achievers will increasingly be found amonst children of high achievers. We are nowhere near equality of opportunity, but if we get there, we will not find equality of outcome.

Also applies to homosexuality - gay bc of genes, not bc someone has 'converted' you to it.

Homocide stats world-wide are dominated by young, unmarried, unemployed men seeking to improve their status or defeat sexual rivals.

More books on Crime

Private schools because of widespread dissatisfaction with the bureaucratically run state system. This is world-wide, and rich and poor, as well as middle classes. James Tooley, educ prof at Newcastle U, catalogued low-cost private schools in slums everywhere. He would get to a country and be solemnly assured by bureaucrats that there were no such thing, but then would go into the slums and find them. Doorless classrooms with unqualified teachers who delivered much better schooling than the govt run ones, and for a pittance. Mainly because, unlike the public system, lazy or incompetent teachers were sacked.

More books on Education

Suggestion that the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the Industrial Revolution were all accidental by-products.

Trade made Italian merchants rich, and because they feared they were sinning with usuary and profiting, they commissioned pious works of art and architecture. Printing made possible the cheap and widespread dissemination of texts which enable reformers to undermine the power of the Catholic Church. And even more far-reaching, printing encouraged literacy, which stimulated demand for eyeglasses which lead to work on lenses and telescopes, which lead to the discovery that the Earth wasn't the center of the Universe.

In 1950, South Korea and Ghana had same income per capita. One received far more aid, advice and political intervention than the other. It is now by far the poorer of the two.

More books on Politics

Crop circles an example of how credulous people cling to beliefs. Even when circles demonstrated as man-made hoaxes, there will still people who insisted that that still didn't mean that some weren't made by aliens landing.

G.K. Chesterton "When people stop believing in something, they don't believe in nothing, they believe in anything." So decline in religious belief accompanied by rise in pseudoscience and other strange beliefs.

The key to many of these beliefs is that cannot be refuted. Anything that seems to prove the belief wrong simply leads to a reinterpretation of the belief and the evidence. Marx's predictions of the coming revolution; Malthusian predictions of coming famines and shortages, Freudian explanations of the mind.

Continuing idea that shouldn't help the poor bc that wd just encourage them to have more babies, so you wd never win. But in fact, the way to end povertyis to bring health, prosperity and education to all. Long after WW2 and Nazi genocides, govts still trying to use oercion to reduce populations - US tied food aid to sterilization programs righ up until 1970's. But turns out that the poor increase birth rate in response to high child death rates. The solution to food shortages and too many babies is prosperity, not Malthusian starvation. "People are more likely to think about having fewer children when they are in a position to worry about sending them to college."









Books by Title

Books by Author

Books by Topic

Bits of Books To Impress